Death penalty. an opposing viewpoints guide
The death penalty.
- Farmington Hills, MI Greenhaven Press/Thomson-Gale c2006.
- 111 p. ill. (chiefly col.) ; 24 cm.
- Writing the critical essay Opposing viewpoints series .
Contents: Introduction background to controversy: Death penalty debate in America Section one: Opposing viewpoints on the death penalty: Viewpoint one: Death penalty should be abolished / Bill Kurtis Viewpoint two: Death penalty should be retained / Paul Rosenzweig Viewpoint three: Death penalty prevents murder / Jeff Jacoby Viewpoint four: Death penalty increases murder / Frederick C. Millett Viewpoint five: Death penalty helps relatives of murder victims / Gail B. Stewart Viewpoint six: Death penalty hurts relatives of murder victims / Pat Bane Viewpoint seven: Death penalty is inhumane / Robert Murray Viewpoint eight: Sparing murderers the death penalty is inhumane / Wesley Lowe Section two: Model essays and writing exercises: Preface: Using cause and effect in the five-paragraph essay Essay one: Capital punishment's application is arbitrary and unfair Exercise one: Create an outline from an existing essay Essay two: Capital punishment helps society Exercise two: Create an outline for an opposing persuasive essay Essay three: Governor concludes that the death penalty is unfair Exercise three: Evaluating and writing introductory and concluding paragraphs Exercise four: Writing a cause-and-effect five-paragraph essay Section three: Supporting research material
Does a state's killing of a convicted murderer help prevent another citizen from committing a crime that otherwise may have been carried out?
0737732083 (lib. : alk. paper)
2005045993
Capital punishment--United States. Essay--Authorship